The ‘Balanced Literacy’ Hoax

Moderators: Debbie Hepplewhite, maizie, Lesley Drake, Susan Godsland

Post Reply
JIM CURRAN
Posts: 3127
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:18 am

The ‘Balanced Literacy’ Hoax

Post by JIM CURRAN » Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:55 am

The ‘Balanced Literacy’ Hoax


My chief mentor, the late Daniel Patrick Moynihan, occasionally warned against “semantic infiltration,” which he correctly attributed to the late arms-control expert, Fred Ikle. It is, of course, the judo-like practice of using terms that are appealing to an audience as fig leaves for practices that the same audience would find repugnant—turning one’s own language against one’s interests, you might say.

Moynihan noted, for example, that countries that style themselves “democratic republics” are almost never either democratic or republics.

So it is with “balanced literacy,” which has reared its head once again in New York City, as schools chancellor Carmen Farina places Teachers College professor Lucy M. Calkins back on the English language arts curricular and pedagogical throne that she briefly occupied a decade ago until Joel Klein learned what a catastrophe that was.

Balanced literacy is neither “balanced” nor “literacy,” at least not in the sense that poor kids taught to read via this approach will end up literate.
http://educationnext.org/balanced-liter ... on+Next%29

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests